Still from Greenpeace viral video attacking Lego for partnering with Shell.
Lego has announced it will be severing its partnership with the oil giant, Dutch Royal Shell, when the current contract expires after a clever campaign by environmental activist group, Greenpeace. Since 2011, Lego has been selling exclusive sets at Shell stations—a deal valued at $116 million—but the companies’ relationship actually goes back decades. In 1966, the Danish toy company first began selling Lego sets with Shell’s brand stamped on them.
Greenpeace targeted the partnership due to Shell’s ongoing plans to drill in the Arctic Ocean for oil. The plans were put on hold in 2012 after an embarrassing series of mishaps, but Shell has recently announced it will pursue drilling rights again for summer 2015.
Greenpeace opposes drilling in the Arctic because of the difficulty of cleaning up any spill due to extreme conditions and remoteness. Moreover, exploiting the Arctic’s oil reserves will only serve to exacerbate global warming, which is the greatest threat to the polar ecosystem.
Shell, however, argues it is prepared for any disaster–despite the company’s many problems two years ago. Shell had hoped to be the world’s first oil company to tap into the Arctic seabed for fossil fuels, but was beaten last year by the Russian company, Gazprom, which is operating a drilling rig south of Severny Island and Yuzhny Island.
In July when Greenpeace first launched the campaign, Lego said it would stick by the oil giant, with Jørgen Vig Knudstorp, CEO of the Lego Group, writing “we are determined to leave a positive impact on society and the planet that children will inherit.”
The company believed it was unfairly targeted by Greenpeace for partnering with Shell.
“The Greenpeace campaign focuses on how Shell operates in a specific part of the world. We firmly believe that this matter must be handled between Shell and Greenpeace. We are saddened when the LEGO brand is used as a tool in any dispute between organizations,” Knudstorp said.
To highlight their opposition, Greenpeace created a slick production of a lego-built Arctic, including iconic animals and native peoples, drowning in a rising tide of oil. The film was viewed by over six million people before Lego buckled.
Yesterday, the company’s tune had changed little, but Knudstorp confirmed “As things currently stand we will not renew the co-promotion contract with Shell when the present contract ends.”
Still the company complained, “We do not agree with the tactics used by Greenpeace that may have created misunderstandings among our stakeholders about the way we operate; and we want to ensure that our attention is not diverted from our commitment to delivering creative and inspiring play experiences.”
Yet there’s little question that the toy giant would have severed its relationship with the oil giant if Greenpeace had not employed such “tactics,” including children building Arctic animals as a protest and tiny lego people infiltrating a Shell station, in addition to the viral video. But it wasn’t just Greenpeace: over a million people signed a petition asking the toy maker to stop its relationship with Shell.
Today, though, neither Lego nor Shell divulged when their relationship would end, since they would not give away the details of a private contract.
“Clearly Shell is trying to piggy back on the credibility of other brands. It’s a good PR strategy if you can get away with it. But as we’ve shown, if you can’t get away with it, that social licensee is taken away. It does damage them a lot,” John Sauven, the executive director of Greenpeace UK, told the Guardian.
Lego blocks are currently made using oil, though the company has said in the past it is working to find new materials to make the iconic toys.
Lego people protest Shell thanks to Greenpeace. Photo by: Greenpeace.
(09/22/2014) In 1870, John D. Rockefeller founded the Standard Oil Company. Rapidly becoming the world’s largest oil refiner, Standard made Rockefeller a billionaire and one of the world’s greatest philanthropists. 144 years later and John D. Rockefeller’s descendants have announced they are stripping fossil fuels from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, a private charity with around $860 million in assets.
(08/29/2014) Tar sands operations have been the subject of much controversy over the past few years as expected economic gains for Canada the may come at the cost of environmental damage from the proposed Keystone XL pipeline and increased greenhouse gas emissions. Now another negative impact has come to light – deforestation of the boreal forest overlying the oil deposits.
(07/29/2014) A ruptured pipeline that spilled tens of thousands of gallons of crude oil into the Marañón River in late June is fueling concerns about potential health impacts for a small indigenous community.
(07/29/2014) Yasuni National park has been in the conservation spotlight in recent years, with oil drilling threatening the forests and wildlife of this biodiversity hotspot. Recently, disturbance in the park may have ramped up, with satellite data showing a significant increase in deforestation alerts within Yasuni National Park since 2011.
(07/23/2014) In an effort to kickstart investment in mining and fossil fuels, Peru has passed a controversial law that overturns many of its environmental protections and essentially defangs its Ministry of Environment. The new law has environmentalists not only concerned about its impact on the country but also that the measures will undermine progress at the up-coming UN Climate Summit in December.
(07/07/2014) What does SOCO’s withdrawal really mean for the future of Virunga National Park? – Part II. Located in the eastern DRC, Virunga is the first national park created in Africa, a World Heritage Site and home to mountain gorillas, of which fewer than 900 remain. As such, SOCO’s announcement to suspend activities followed in the wake of a concerted campaign led by WWF to “draw the line” to save Virunga from devastation by prospective oil drilling.
(06/17/2014) Recent headlines have touted an agreement between SOCO International, a British oil company, and WWF, as bringing about an end to oil exploration in Virunga National Park. For example: Oil company Soco not to drill in Virunga World Heritage Site, Deal aims to ban drilling in gorilla preserve, and Soco halts oil exploration in Africa’s Virunga national park. However, the same news banners flew in 2011, and oil exploration returned.
(06/13/2014) Decades of oil extraction in the Western Amazon has caused widespread pollution, raising questions about the impact of a new oil boom in the region, according to a team of Spanish researchers presenting at a conference in California.